Re: Tracking latest timeline in standby mode

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> I dropped the ball on this one, but now that we have pg_basebackup and
>> "pg_ctl promote" which make it easy to set up a standby and failover, I
>> think we should still do this in 9.1. Otherwise you need a restart to have a
>> 2nd standby server track the TLI change that failover causes.
>
> +1 for doing this!

+1

Comments:

+        if (!list_member_int(expectedTLIs,
+                             (int) recoveryTargetTLI))
+            ereport(LOG,
+                    (errmsg("new timeline %u is not a child of database system timeline %u",

We should check whether recoveryTargetTLI is a member of newExpectedTLIs
instead of expectedTLIs?

>    +                       /* Switch target */
>
>    +                       recoveryTargetTLI = newtarget;
>    +                       expectedTLIs = newExpectedTLIs;
>
>     Before "expectedTLIs = newExpectedTLIs", we should call
>     list_free_deep(expectedTLIs)?
>
> It's an integer list so list_free(expectedTLIs) is enough, and I doubt that leakage will ever be a problem in
practice,but in principle you're right.
 

True. But I think that it's good habit to fix a leakage no matter how
small it's.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center