Re: gmpy adapter
От | Daniele Varrazzo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: gmpy adapter |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikhs6oaDr8S-=5+uT1urB2aGpV1P_vif=m=tSG6@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | gmpy adapter (Daniel Popowich <danielpopowich@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: gmpy adapter
|
Список | psycopg |
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Popowich <danielpopowich@gmail.com> wrote: > 1) Is there something I'm overlooking with gmpy that could make this > much simpler? Why don't you use mpf instead? Arbitrary precision float may map better than rationals to the database decimals. > 2) What other solutions do folk use for working around pythons slow, > slow, slow Decimal? There are around C implementations compatible with Python decimals: http://www.bytereef.org/mpdecimal/index.html for example. Also notice that float64 has 53 bits of precision, 15 full decimal digits. If you don't need more precision when you write data in the database (even if you have used more during calculations) you may just use the repr(float()) of your mpq to write into the database. -- Daniele
В списке psycopg по дате отправления: