Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikh+XAs8Ph5RwtzJPLo_bVc8w5LwDDEStQjEQd5@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Kevin Grittner > <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: >> Maybe the thing to focus on first is the oft-discussed "benchmark >> farm" (similar to the "build farm"), with a good mix of loads, so >> that the impact of changes can be better tracked for multiple >> workloads on a variety of platforms and configurations. Without >> something like that it is very hard to justify the added complexity >> of an idea like this in terms of the performance benefit gained. > > A related area that could use some looking at is why performance tops > out at shared_buffers ~8GB and starts to fall thereafter. Under what circumstances does this happen? Can a simple pgbench -S with a large scaling factor elicit this behavior? Cheers, Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: