Re: Should psql support URI syntax?
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should psql support URI syntax? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikgTzZTBuQKPABRzbjFZVoGW+72bgg8TbEg4gaN@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should psql support URI syntax? (Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should psql support URI syntax?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >> I would think it would be purely syntatic sugar really, which does >> incorporate a familiar interface for those who are working in >> different >> worlds (.Net/Drupal/JAVA) etc... > > I wouldn't mind having something more standard supported; I'm always looking up the conninfo for the options I don't usefrequently. I have a sneaking suspicion that the options you have to look up won't be any more obvious (or standardized) in a URI connection string. That said, I do support adding this in the future, if only to keep up with the Jones'. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: