Re: [HACKERS] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> Robert Haas  wrote:
>
>> Is this a JDBC patch or a PG patch? Are we tracking JDBC patches
>> using the CF app?
>
> If this were the only patch for setQueryTimeout in front of us I
> probably wouldn't have suggested that, but this thread started with a
> patch proposal to implement the same JDBC feature through adding new
> backend functions.  Unless that patch is withdrawn or rejected, it
> seems odd for two different groups to be simultaneously considering
> patches to implement exactly the same functionality....

True.  I thought we had decided on the client-side approach, but maybe
I'm confused.  I don't have a position one way or the other, just
trying to understand the state of the conversation.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company