Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTika0ZWQO0aYgdct_N7XarVCvj1eGZZRRH9uGfRw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues) (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re:
[BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >>> AFAIR nothing's been done about it, so it's a TODO. >> > >> >> I was thinking of adding it to the 9.1 open items list, but the wiki's >> >> been down every time I've tried to go there. >> > >> > Since the problem's been there since forever, I don't see that it's an >> > open item for 9.1. ?That list normally is for "must fix before ship" >> > items, not development projects. >> >> OK. If you don't feel it warrants being on that list, then the TODO >> is OK with me. > > Agreed. Do you want me to do it, or will you? You do it. :-) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: