Re: MS Access and field-level permissions?
От | Richard Broersma |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MS Access and field-level permissions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikY1x9nES=5ezYXVF3Q-oaEyf5iZfsnxLc5Q0uR@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | MS Access and field-level permissions? (Benjamin Smith <lists@benjamindsmith.com>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Benjamin Smith <lists@benjamindsmith.com> wrote: > We're using field level permissions to restrict what data is accessible over > ODBC - we're enabling SELECT only and on a restrictive set of fields. But, when > we try to link up with MS Access, none of the fields are populated. You can see > the fields, but never the content of the fields. I've never tried to setup field level permissions on access linked tables before, so this is news to me. However, I wonder if this behavior is a result of the way MS-Access implements optimistic locking. I'll have to do more digging on this subject. > Similarly, with this configuration, via psql when I run "select * from table" > where I don't have permissions to all fields in the table, I get a "Permission > denied" error rather than any content. This is correct. This is the way it is documented to work since '*' expands to list every field of the set. -- Regards, Richard Broersma Jr. Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG) http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: