Re: [PATCH] Return command tag 'REPLACE X' for CREATE OR REPLACE statements.
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Return command tag 'REPLACE X' for CREATE OR REPLACE statements. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikVmBshatVrAB5qdrDcXJKaXhc2bjwvND-cV8_f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Return command tag 'REPLACE X' for CREATE OR REPLACE statements. (Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Return command tag 'REPLACE X' for CREATE OR
REPLACE statements.
Re: [PATCH] Return command tag 'REPLACE X' for CREATE OR REPLACE statements. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> wrote: > There's a similar case with CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS, maybe this is > worth covering in an updated patch too? > And if I change that, people might expect the same from DROP X IF EXISTS too? It's far less clear what you'd change those cases to say, and they already emit a NOTICE, so it seems unnecessary. >> Also, I don't really like the way this spreads knowledge of the >> completionTag out all over the backend. I think it would be better to >> follow the existing model used by the COPY and COMMIT commands, >> whereby the return value indicates what happened and >> standard_ProcessUtility() uses that to set the command tag. > > Right. I created this pattern after PerformPortalFetch() which already > took a completionTag argument. But your approach seems more > reasonable. OK. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: