Re: Documenting removal of nonnullvalue() and friends
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Documenting removal of nonnullvalue() and friends |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikUKtngdLHCeqi=iERU6ydvQRcsW8EoaSwkrT3o@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Documenting removal of nonnullvalue() and friends (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Documenting removal of nonnullvalue() and friends
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> I find the idea of things being intentionally undocumented quite >> difficult. How is someone coming along supposed to know which things >> are intentionally undocumented and which things are unintentionally >> undocumented? > > They should assume the lack of documentation is intentional. Six or > seven years ago your argument might have held some water, but we've > been quite rigorous about requiring externally-visible features to be > documented from the get-go. That just doesn't match my experience. We goof. People find it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: