Re: back branches vs. VS 2008
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikTEaLeuHLgRSenzid_=kSRyWMS32RV5aAOGR=X@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: back branches vs. VS 2008 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes: >> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >>>> And we're not going to be changing the version that's actually used >>>> for the official binary builds, so all you'll accomplish then is to >>>> have the buildfarm test something different form what we're shipping. > >>> Are you speaking for EDB on that? > >> He's not speaking *for* us, but he's absolutely right. > > OK, so what about the next question: is EDB running buildfarm members > that will test the VS version(s) you are using? I don't think Andrew > is under any obligation to do that for you. Yes, except for VC++ 2008/Win7 which we use for 9.0. That one remains on my todo list. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: