Re: JDBC gripe list (the autocommit subthread)
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC gripe list (the autocommit subthread) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikSmrT2wO9+i4u95T1fYB=chxycMpwCrinj_kzi@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JDBC gripe list (the autocommit subthread) (Quartz <quartz12h@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: JDBC gripe list (the autocommit subthread)
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
So what is the use case for autocommit = true for batch inserts ? to me the whole point of batch inserts is speed with autocommit= false it should be faster. I would also think the logic is much simpler if I get an all or nothing commit. Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Quartz <quartz12h@yahoo.com> wrote: >> I'm coming around to the position that we shouldn't tinker >> with >> autoCommit within the executeBatch method. I still >> think it would >> be best for us to consistently bail out on the first >> failure, but if >> autoCommit is on, we could build the BatchUpdateException >> using an >> array of the length of the successfully completed >> statements. If >> autoCommit is off, I'm not sure whether it would be better >> to leave >> the updateCounts property null or use a zero length array; >> but >> clearly no statements should be considered successful. >> >> The API documentation does seem to suggest it should work >> that way. >> >> The bad news is that this would be a behavior change, and >> could thus >> break existing code for current PostgreSQL users. >> When that's the >> case, we generally like to see a reasonable use case for >> the new >> behavior even when it is standard. So far we have a >> rather >> hand-wavy assertion that it would be useful for logging and >> "an >> infinite number of" other uses. It would probably >> help sway the >> community if there was a more concrete explanation of why >> this was >> better than the alternatives for logging purposes, and to >> sketch out >> one or two of the other infinite number of use cases. > > > You have been defending all that long that most use the autocommit=false when using batches. Then they won't break....! > > Besides that's what release notes are for. And I dare say, if they expected a transaction when using a batch with autocommit=true,it about time they learn their mistake. JDBC api is a contract. Can't make exception for postgres. > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: