Re: git: uh-oh

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 15:37, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 06:09, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> If we can set it to a value different from any actual committer name,
>>> that would be a good thing to do.
>
>> I intentionally picked the "pgsql" user because AFAIK that's what
>> we've been previously using for "commits that aren't commits".
>
> Uh, no, not so.  Marc used to use that ID for commits related to
> pushing new versions.  It's been retired, but there's nothing un-real
> about the commits under that ID.  Please pick something else.  I thought
> the suggestion of cvs2git was a good one.

Ok, I'll switch to that - no problem. Should the name really be
"PostgreSQL Daemon" then? (Because that's what it's called on the cvs
box, but that's probably just a coincidence)


--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/