Re: Sync Rep Design
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Sync Rep Design |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTikMYiH0y8JMoVz6JFbtnNxZxKV-SyF7Cv4ch5dt@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Sync Rep Design (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: >> What's weird about using the role name? That's our standard way of >> distinguishing between two or more users. Why invent something new? > > wel a user is not a host/server for me - given there is no real benefit from > using distinct roles for each standby yet I don't see why we should > complicate the replication setup procedure by requiring 1 role per standby. > So I'm all for giving each standby a name but please make it an explicit one > and not something that is only vaguely related to the actual standby host. OK. If that's the consensus, can someone post a patch? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: