Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikM2VpD3baVgU+8tgWXfeTQrHBhgpw9RzEWCk-1@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > Oleg, > > * Oleg Bartunov (oleg@sai.msu.su) wrote: >> what do you need for documentation ? From users point of view we add just >> knn support and all examples are available in btree_gist.sql and sql >> subdirectory. Contact me directly, if you have questions. > > It sure seems like > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/btree-gist.html could be and > should be improved, in general.. If this module is really still just a > test bed for GiST, then perhaps it's not a big deal.. I agree that the documentation there could be a lot better, but I don't think that's a commit-blocker for this patch. However, "us reaching beta" will be a commit-blocker. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: