Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search
От | zhong ming wu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikK1Mft93efVHDTf8p3DXW0JYVhE6pWr3Dsyt9G@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search (Howard Rogers <hjr@diznix.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search
Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Howard Rogers <hjr@diznix.com> wrote: > Thanks to some very helpful input here in earlier threads, I was > finally able to pull together a working prototype Full Text Search > 'engine' on PostgreSQL and compare it directly to the way the > production Oracle Text works. The good news is that PostgreSQL is > bloody fast! The slightly iffy news is that the boss is now moaning > about possible training costs! > > For what it's worth, I wrote up the performance comparison here: > http://diznix.com/dizwell/archives/153 I always thought there is a clause in their user agreement preventing the users from publishing benchmarks like that. I must be mistaken.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: