Re: pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikJmP+bo1N-mFUWEpJiV6_OKisYw512OGeTJUbm@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled
synchronous replication.
Re: pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
Список | pgsql-committers |
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. > If a standby is broadcasting reply messages and we have named > one or more standbys in synchronous_standby_names then allow > users who set synchronous_replication to wait for commit, which > then provides strict data integrity guarantees. Design avoids > sending and receiving transaction state information so minimises > bookkeeping overheads. We synchronize with the highest priority > standby that is connected and ready to synchronize. Other standbys > can be defined to takeover in case of standby failure. > > This version has very strict behaviour; more relaxed options > may be added at a later date. Pretty cool! I'd appreciate very much your efforts and contributions. And,, I found one bug ;) You seem to have wrongly removed the check of max_wal_senders in SyncRepWaitForLSN. This can make the backend wait for replication even if max_wal_senders = 0. I could produce this problematic situation in my machine. The attached patch fixes this problem. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
Вложения
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: