Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikJh7XGZD+SE=pwfnPJxkZT=0RSY9rUDUzd5gge@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build (Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
And hopefully Magnus will be able to help here too! On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> wrote: > Seems I omitted to copy my system's FlexLexer.h to > ./pgadmin3/pgadmin/include/pgscript. Seemingly the FlexLexer.h that > ships with pgadmin is for Flex 2.5.33 only. I have 2.5.35. > > However, I now get a slightly different set of compiler errors, so I'm > not much better off. > > pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:944:10: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack’ was not declared > in this scope > pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:944:10: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack_top’ was not > declared in this scope > pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:945:27: error: ‘yyensure_buffer_stack’ was not > declared in this scope > pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:1858:8: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack’ was not declared > in this scope > > ...and so on... > > Why do we ship a copy of FlexLexer.h from a specific version of > flex++? Are we really that sensitive to the differences in Flex > versions? Is the easiest thing to get pgadmin to build after changing > the pgscript grammar to use flex 2.5.33, as perhaps suggested in > ./pgadmin3/pgadmin/pgscript/README? > > -- > Regards, > Peter Geoghegan > -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: