Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: Weird issues when reading UDT from stored function
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: Weird issues when reading UDT from stored function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikHdYF407NgX=giNEizY8Z2tcN47xkxuLBO73J=@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: Weird issues when reading UDT from stored function (Lukas Eder <lukas.eder@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: Weird issues when reading UDT from stored
function
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Lukas Eder <lukas.eder@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not trying to fix the signature. I want exactly that signature. I want > to return 1 UDT as an OUT parameter from a function. > > Somewhere between JDBC and the database, this signature is lost, and JDBC's > internal code tells me that I have to bind 6 OUT parameters, instead of 1. > It happens to be so, because the UDT contains 6 attributes, so somehow the > JDBC/database protocol flattens the UDT, and I think that's a bug, either in > JDBC or in the protocol or in the database. My findings were that I can > correctly read the UDT OUT parameter using the pgAdmin III tool, so I > excluded the database as a bug holder candidate. Oh, OK. Sorry, I can't help you any with the JDBC side... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: