Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikGK62xzg9wT9Jx0ofk=qNqGjBad5WV7rr5Tto2@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 17:23, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>> On the other hand, the REPLICATION privilege is denying you the right to >>> perform an operation *even though you already are authenticated as a >>> superuser*. I don't think there's anywhere else in the system where >>> we allow a privilege to non-super-users but deny that same privilege >>> to super-users, and I don't think we should be starting now. >> >> You might want to reflect on rolcatupdate a bit before asserting that >> there are no cases where privileges are ever denied to superusers. > > Oh, huh. I wasn't aware of that. > >> However, that precedent would suggest that the default should be to >> grant the replication bit to superusers. > > Yes it would. Just to be clear: are we saying that "CREATE ROLE foo SUPERUSER" should grant both superuser and replication, as well as the default "postgres" user also having replication as well? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: