Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Specification for Trusted PLs? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikFvcC7g9wSplJaU3RbWGf467VRxC2Nx59sNhNe@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Specification for Trusted PLs? (Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/5/21 Jan Wieck <JanWieck@yahoo.com>: >> The original idea was that a trusted language does not allow an unprivileged >> user to gain access to any object or data, he does not have access to >> without that language. >> >> This does not include data transformation functionality, like string >> processing or the like. As long as the user had legitimate access to the >> input datum, then every derived form thereof is OK. > > I find the current doc enough, add this prose from Jan as a comment > might help people perhaps. Yeah, Jan's description is very clear and to the point. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: