Re: Really really slow select count(*)
| От | Scott Marlowe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Really really slow select count(*) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTikFaJsaR_4M8rw4Wwyu_N+5yx2+7MQOZgXPt-kX@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Really really slow select count(*) (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Really really slow select count(*)
Re: Really really slow select count(*) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Marti Raudsepp wrote: >> >> I couldn't find any past discussions about changing the default to "fast". >> Are there any reasons why that cannot be done in a future release? >> > Kevin and I both suggested a "fast plus timeout then immediate" behavior is > what many users seem to want. My comments were at > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg01145.php ; for an > example of how fast shutdown can fail see > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-03/msg00062.php Are there any settings in postgresql.conf that would make it unsafe to use -m immediate?
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: