Re: PG-Git usernames
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG-Git usernames |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikEXJDauCQy1Q1oHiAZOaet0AGjZFX0zZAekNED@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG-Git usernames (Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PG-Git usernames
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 16:09, Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 15:50, Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I hope this is the right forum to talk about git.postgresql.org >> > >> > My community login is singh.gurjeet, but our setup seems to not like the >> > special character there; users/singh.gurjeet/postgres is rejected. >> > >> > Would it be a problem if I requested users/gsingh/postgres ? I hope that >> > doesn't cause any trouble with gitweb or anything. Or can it be allowed >> > to >> > have the preiod character there? >> >> That should be fine. I'm sure we could adapt the software to allow >> periods, but there is no tie between the directory and the username, >> so you can just use that. Or just "singhgurjeet" without the period. >> >> Or you could just use github which gives you more features at the > > >> >> same cost ;) > > I like their competitive pricing :) which is why I created a > postgres/postgres fork there and started patching while waiting for this > one. :-) > I was assuming that having a fork here at git.pg and then referring people > to my branches would be more convenient than asking them to check them out > on github. Any merits/demerits you see with github? Not really. On the web interface, the github one provides better functionality - for example the compare view which is a lot better than gitweb on git.postgresql.org, particularly when checking work-in-progress patches, IMHO. On the git side of things, they both support the same thing - if someone wants to merge your patch they can just add it the remote and fetch, regardless of if it's in the github or git.pg.org repository. Personally, I don't see any advantage at all of git.postgresql.org over github for a development repository. Others may have different opinions, of course. For a *primary* repository, there can certainly be reasons. Which is why for example pgadmin3 has the main repository on git.postgresql.org - but the developers who use public repos (for example Guillaume - http://github.com/gleu) use github. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: