Re: system views for walsender activity
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: system views for walsender activity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikDhKsA83Msyaua4dDDjXU4HVV7=pFEQQKkUs_r@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: system views for walsender activity (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: system views for walsender activity
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > The sent pointer is needed whether or not we have sync rep. We should > also include application name, since the user may set that in the > standby for all the same reasons it is set elsewhere. > > Small point: please lets not call this pg_stat_walsender? > pg_stat_replication_sent and pg_stat_replication_received would be > easier for normal humans to understand. Eh... I may be showing my status as a non-normal human, but I know exactly what pg_stat_walsender is (it's the view that shows you the status of the WAL senders you've allowed by configuring max_wal_senders>0) but I have no idea what pg_stat_replication_sent and pg_stat_replication_received are supposed to be. Why two views? *scratches head in confusion* -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: