Re: ToDo List Item - System Table Index Clustering
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ToDo List Item - System Table Index Clustering |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTik=EfPBjArm+b17VdWnr5TZMZvAK5CQNEXeWnbo@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ToDo List Item - System Table Index Clustering (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: ToDo List Item - System Table Index Clustering
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Simone Aiken >> <saiken@quietlycompetent.com> wrote: >>> Pages like this one have column comments for the system tables: >>> >>> http://www.psql.it/manuale/8.3/catalog-pg-attribute.html > >> Oh, I see. I don't think we want to go there. We'd need some kind of >> system for keeping the two places in sync. > > I seem to recall some muttering about teaching genbki to extract such > comments from the SGML sources or perhaps the C header files. I tend to > agree though that it would be a lot more work than it's worth. And as > you say, pg_description entries aren't free. > > Which brings up another point though. I have a personal TODO item to > make the comments for operator support functions more consistent: > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/21407.1287157253@sss.pgh.pa.us > Should we consider removing those comments altogether, instead? I could go either way on that. Most of those comments are pretty short, aren't they? How much storage are they really costing us? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: