Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTik6wMrETbVw15=YswhioMPEk=QaxbjXU+Hf==Hq@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> You're moving the bar. It DOES say that the CommitFest will end on >>> February 15th. Now, if we want to have a discussion about changing >>> that, let's have that discussion (perhaps on a thread where the >>> subject has something to do with the topic), but we DID talk about >>> this, it WAS agreed, and it's been sitting there on the wiki for >>> something like 8 months. Obviously, there will continue to be >>> polishing after the CommitFest is over, but that's not the same thing >>> as saying we're going to lengthen the CommitFest itself. >> >> I'm not moving the bar - I'm talking practically. Regardless of when >> we consider the commitfest itself over, development and commit work of >> new features has always continued until beta 1, and that has not >> changed as far as I'm aware. > > I don't think that's really true. Go back and read the output of 'git > log REL9_0_BETA1'. It's bug fixes, rearrangements of things that were > committed but turned out to be controversial, documentation work, > release note editing, pgindent crap... sure, it wasn't a totally hard > freeze, but it was pretty solid slush. We did a good job not letting > things drag out, and FWIW I think that was a good decision. I don't > remember too many people being unhappy about their patches getting > punted, either. There were one or two, but generally we punted things > that needed major rework or just weren't getting updated in a timely > fashion, and that, combined with a lot of hard work on Tom's part > among others, worked fine. I guess we disagree on what we consider to be "development" then. Just looking back to April, I see various committers whacking things around that look to me like the fine tuning and completion of earlier patches. Oh - and just so we're clear... I too want us to get the release out promptly, I'm just concerned that we don't blindside developers. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: