Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?)
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTik3Q5J=M8hTY8L5cm04GKjjy2uz6Aq9Kquxoh3X@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?)  (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
2010/12/17 Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 02:03, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>        FOREACH scalar-variable IN ARRAY array-expression
>>>        FOR_EACH scalar-variable IN ARRAY array-expression
>>>        FOR_SLICE array-variable [DEPTH n] IN ARRAY array-expression
>>>        FOREACH scalar-variable IN ARRAY array-expression
>>>        FOREACH array-variable SLICE n IN ARRAY array-expression
>> FOREACH scalar IN ARRAY arr_exp DIMS in dim_var
>
> It should be not a main subject, but I remember there was a discussion
> that "IN ARRAY array-expression" looks redundant for a literal array:
>
>  IN ARRAY ARRAY[1, 3, 5]
>
> Are there any improvement for the issue?

yes. It know it. The reason for this is bigger space for possible
future features related to FOREACH loop.

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Itagaki Takahiro
>

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: