Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting
От | Itagaki Takahiro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTik2XxiuzgV=Ft5yWUcukWN3c4AViMhSm2aP9TTx@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting
Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 00:14, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >> pg_ctl failover ? At the moment, the location of the trigger file is >> configurable, but if we accept a constant location like "$PGDATA/failover" >> pg_ctl could do the whole thing, create the file and send signal. pg_ctl on >> Window already knows how to send the "signal" via the named pipe signal >> emulation. > > The attached patch implements the above-mentioned pg_ctl failover. I have three comments: - Will we call it "failover"? We will use the command also in "switchover" operations. "pg_ctl promote" might be more neutral,but users might be hard to imagine replication feature from "promote". - pg_ctl should unlink failover_files when it failed to send failover signals. - "standby_triggered" variable might be renamed to "failover_triggered" or so. -- Itagaki Takahiro
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: