Re: updated patch for foreach stmt
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: updated patch for foreach stmt |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTik1bzO9wRyB46jQZbBQNNDm=5J=Wxh=LhRsSi8A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: updated patch for foreach stmt (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: updated patch for foreach stmt
Re: updated patch for foreach stmt Re: updated patch for foreach stmt |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > Greetings, > > * Pavel Stehule (pavel.stehule@gmail.com) wrote: >> I resend a patch with last update of this patch > > Alright, so, like I said, I really like this feature and would like to > see it included. To that end, I've done perhaps a bit more than a > review of the patch. Pavel, if you could go over the changes I've made > and review them and let me know if you see any problems, I'd appreciate > it. I've tried to get it ready for a committer as much as I can without > being one. :) Amen to that! I think the syntax Tom suggested before was FOREACH thingy IN ARRAY arr rather than just FOREACH thingy IN arr. That's probably a good idea, because it gives us an escape hatch against needing to invent yet another variant of this syntax - the word immediately following IN can be known with confidence to be intended as a keyword rather than as part of the expression. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: