Re: BUG #5763: pg_hba.conf not honored
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #5763: pg_hba.conf not honored |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTik1TCt3oX=cUZ0UiqAe2XdeDc5uX18z4xCFsqgx@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #5763: pg_hba.conf not honored (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #5763: pg_hba.conf not honored
Re: BUG #5763: pg_hba.conf not honored |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Kaiting Chen" <kaitocracy@gmail.com> writes: >> From this pg_hba configuration as the user 'kaiting.chen' is not in role >> 'service' the second entry in the table should be skipped and he should >> authenticate via GSSAPI. However this does not happen. > > I believe the definition of "in role" we use here is "has the privileges > of role". =A0Since kaiting.chen is a superuser, all privilege tests will > succeed for him, including that one. =A0IOW, a superuser is automatically > a member of every role. =A0This isn't a bug. I guess it's not a bug if we did it that way on purpose, but it seems like testing for actual group membership would be less surprising. --=20 Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: