Re: BUG #5699: Postgres runs only under default user.
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #5699: Postgres runs only under default user. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTik0KcfxpSs=1XSbOFwpXcMupw249ZoL3NhH_KBO@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #5699: Postgres runs only under default user. (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote: > On 10/08/2010 07:53 PM, Johannes Meidert wrote: >> >> The following bug has been logged online: >> >> Bug reference: =A0 =A0 =A05699 >> Logged by: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Johannes Meidert >> Email address: =A0 =A0 =A0johannes.meidert@rohde-schwarz.com >> PostgreSQL version: 9.0.1 >> Operating system: =A0 windows >> Description: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Postgres runs only under default user. >> Details: >> >> If a --superaccount is specified during installation other than >> 'postgres', >> the service will not start correctly and there are lots of errors "role >> <postgres> =A0does not exist" in the DB error log. >> The option -- superaccount should be removed. > > It does seem a bit odd - if the super account is wired into the database > cluster at initdb time, you'd think it'd be read from there on startup. > > Comments, anybody? This report hasn't seen a response, but seems to have > some legitimacy as a usability issue if not an outright bug. I saw an email from our QA team a few minutes ago saying they have been unable to reproduce the problem. What command line/options file did you use exactly Johannes? --=20 Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: