Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTik-YDEXJHrXMAXvNOQh_COdg8+XOu2viHaj4Rmj@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4 (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le 24/08/2010 14:05, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Guillaume Lelarge >> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >>> Le 24/08/2010 13:51, Dave Page a écrit : >>>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Actually, what happens if we try to use PQconnect() with >>>>> applicaiton_name on an older version? I assume it fails, and not just >>>>> works and ignores it? >>>> >>>> iirc, yes. >>>> >>> >>> We have this in the log: >>> >>> FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter "application_name" >>> >>> And then it connects. >>> >>> At least with a 9.0 libpq and a 8.3.0 PostgreSQL server. >> >> Yeah, the interesting thing would be an 8.3 libpq, if you just throw >> it the connection string and don't try to use PQparseconnInfo(). >> > > It fails. If the user has a 8.3 libpq, we should not send the > application_name connection parameter. That means Dave is perfectly correct, and thus someone needs to write that patch ;) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: