Re: upper and UTF-8
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: upper and UTF-8 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=zTKL_=shdzrtNibyWoB5ST1PqB82KnfXPNE73@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: upper and UTF-8 (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Benjamin Krajmalnik <kraj@servoyant.com> wrote: >> Unfortunately, the database has to accept data in multiple languages, since it is a SaaS offering. > > The encoding determines that, not the collation. UTF-8 allows you to > insert various languages in that encoding. > >> It is not a big deal - I just found it interesting that it did not uppercase the accented letters. > > Just tested it and the lc_collate seems to make the difference. To be more specific, when my lc_collate is en_US, it works properly. I didn't have to use a spanish collation to make it work. Note that changing collation will change sort order, and some matching rules and things like that. Also, a db is usually noticeably faster working with text in locale of C, because it then treats the data mostly as though it's in byte order.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: