Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP)
От | Itagaki Takahiro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=z=Wa4bGUCxF7DTEBxyn+v9Zed1cowaF_pfTiR@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP) (Terry Laurenzo <tj@laurenzo.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Are there any activities in JSON data types for the next commitfest? I'd like to help you if you are working on the topic, or I can make up previous works and discussions by myself. On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Terry Laurenzo <tj@laurenzo.org> wrote: >> Yeah, my concern is not whether the overhead will be zero; it's >> whether it will be small, yet allow large gains on other operations. >> Like, how much slower will it be to pull out a moderately complex 1MB >> JSON blob (not just a big string) out of a single-row, single-column >> table? If it's 5% slower, that's probably OK, since this is a >> reasonable approximation of a worst-case scenario. If it's 50% >> slower, that sounds painful. It would also be worth testing with a >> much smaller size, such as a 1K object with lots of internal >> structure. In both cases, all data cached in shared_buffers, etc. >> >> Then on the flip side how do we do on val[37]["whatever"]? You'd like >> to hope that this will be significantly faster than the text encoding >> on both large and small objects. If it's not, there's probably not >> much point. > > We're on the same page. I'm implementing the basic cases now and then will > come up with some benchmarks. -- Itagaki Takahiro
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: