Re: .gitignore files, take two
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: .gitignore files, take two |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=y8dMTgf1DJz7Bx2bhFDvyyW6tZ8SR1_GanWzp@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: .gitignore files, take two (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: .gitignore files, take two
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 20:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 20:21, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >>> On tis, 2010-09-21 at 11:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> rather than global ignore patterns for *.a and *.so.[0-9] >>> >>> Probably rather *.so.[0-9.]+ > >> Any particular reason not to just do .so.*? > > Just paranoia, I guess. I can't actually see a reason why we'd have > any committable files in the tree matching that pattern. OTOH, we > probably also need the same type of pattern for .sl and .dylib, > so at some point a more conservative pattern would be wise. Do we know what the exact pattern would be for .sl and .dylib? Are they following the same basic pattern of .sl.<major>.<minor>? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: