Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTi=wADn4rToSqnMmOBZ8L_Z15iqPgha4kymJZ6zK@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Marko Tiikkaja's message of vie jul 23 17:44:21 -0400 2010: >> On 7/24/10 12:37 AM +0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> > Excerpts from Marko Tiikkaja's message of vie jul 23 14:13:18 -0400 2010: > >> > I don't think it's fair game to change the behavior of multiple-output >> > rules at this point. However, I also think that it's unwise to base >> > wCTEs on the behavior of rules -- rules are widely considered broken and >> > unusable for nontrivial cases. >> >> I don't want to change the behaviour either, but we have two different >> behaviours right now. We need to change at least the other. > > It seems like it's EXPLAIN ANALYZE that needs fixing. I would suggest that if we're going to change this, we back-patch it to 9.0 before beta4. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: