Re: Indent authentication overloading
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Indent authentication overloading |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=ufrKMd2hGWJadFmveJXeshexL4kg1SeGLjSbM@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Indent authentication overloading (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Indent authentication overloading
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 16:17, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 14:43, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Also, the text is not accurate: nothing has been automatically changed >>> to anything. The pg_hba.conf file is just as it was. You could say >>> something like "ident" authentication on local socket treated as >>> "peer", but I think a better idea would be to just remove this message >>> altogether. > >> The idea being to let people know it's been deprecated, nothing else. >> But sure, we can just remove the message - at elast for now, and maybe >> add it $n releases down the road when people are expected to have >> changed over. > > I'm with Robert on this one --- the first reaction I had to your > description of the patch was "why do we need a log message for that?" > If there were some real reason to push people away from use of the > non-preferred term, maybe it'd be worth nagging them to change; but > there isn't. Ok. fair enough, I'll take that part out. Are people in general in favor of making the change provided I do that, then? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: