Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
От | Koichi Suzuki |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=sgRhLmRaXt1L4_SReDRfb9Od5+A9jOqS01NPr@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert; Thank you very much for your advice. Indeed, I'm considering to change the license to PostgreSQL's one. It may take a bit more though... ---------- Koichi Suzuki 2010/12/15 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Koichi Suzuki <koichi.szk@gmail.com> wrote: >> This is what Postgres-XC is doing between a coordinator and a >> datanode. Coordinator may correspond to poolers/loadbalancers. >> Does anyone think it makes sense to extract XC implementation of >> snapshot shipping to PostgreSQL itself? > > Perhaps, though of course it would need to be re-licensed. I'd be > happy to see us pursue a snapshot cloning framework, wherever it comes > from. I remain unconvinced that it should be made a hard requirement > for parallel pg_dump, but of course if we can get it implemented then > the point becomes moot. > > Let's not let this fall on the floor. Someone should pursue this, > whether it's Joachim or Koichi or someone else. > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: