Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]
| От | Alex Hunsaker |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH] |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTi=rZk8gWaneW=XWmey+HWUHvZbTHLULfq5Z_sO5@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH] (Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 15:48, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 13:04, Alexey Klyukin <alexk@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:52 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: >> >>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 5:14 AM, Alexey Klyukin wrote: >>> >>>> You mean packing both a string representation and a reference to a single SV * value? >>> >>> Dunno, I'm not a guts guy. >> >> Well, neither me (I haven't used much of the guts api there). > > Find attached a proof of concept that modifies Alexey's patch to do > the above (using the overload example I and others posted). [ ... ] > Thoughts? Should I polish this a bit more? Or do we like the GUC better? So its been over a week with no comments. ISTM there were more people against adding yet another GUC. Barring objection ill finish the missing parts of the POC patch I posted and submit that.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: