Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY
От | Dean Rasheed |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=qFrH4vanBEBgY9WCa8aERdyLLTN=EPSvOLJ+-@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5 September 2010 16:15, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes: >> On 7 August 2010 03:51, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I was testing out this feature this morning and discovered that the >> results may be non-deterministic if the PK is deferrable. > > Good point. > >> The original version of the patch had that check in it, but it >> vanished from the final committed version. Was that just an oversight, >> or an intentional change? > > I don't recall having thought about it one way or the other. What did > the check look like? > Well originally it was searching indexes rather than constraints, and funcdeps_check_pk() included the following check: if (!indexStruct->indisprimary || !indexStruct->indimmediate)continue; Now its looping over pg_constraint entries, so I guess anything wtih con->condeferrable == true should be ignored. Regards, Dean
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: