Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTi=pn_n1d3Y+MbzNoA+ipv=vcDU6HLPQOMRn1vbf@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL (SAKAMOTO Masahiko <sakamoto.masahiko@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/9/16 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>: >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Yet there are other cases that probably *could* work well based on a >>> storage-level abstraction boundary; index-organized tables for instance. >>> So I think we need to have some realistic idea of what we want to >>> support and design an API accordingly, not hope that if we don't >>> know what we want we will somehow manage to pick an API that makes >>> all things possible. >> >> Agreed. Random ideas: index-organized tables... > > I'd love to see a table that is based on one of the existing KVSs. I'm not familiar with the term KVS? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: