Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTi=pehZj1Bb8KVusGykyEzWn__pif-87Tz2beJYj@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD  (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>)
Ответы Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD  (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>)
Список pgsql-performance
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> wrote:

> ANY disk that says "write is complete" when it really is not is entirely
> unsuitable for ANY real database use.  It is simply a matter of time

What about read only slaves where there's a master with 100+spinning
hard drives "getting it right" and you need a half dozen or so read
slaves?  I can imagine that being ok, as long as you don't restart a
server after a crash without checking on it.

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Karl Denninger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD
Следующее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD