Re: Additional options for Sync Replication
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Additional options for Sync Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=oOXOB4EhPFP31aTJ1NWWeMPHTm-gNzZkmypMe@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Additional options for Sync Replication (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Additional options for Sync Replication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> You have no basis on which to prevent this. > > It's also already on the Open Items list, put there by you. Huh? There is an open item about whether we should merge synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication into a single GUC, which might be a better interface since it would typically give the user one less thing to have to fiddle with, but there is certainly no open item for adding additional sync rep modes. Merging those two GUCs is a reasonable thing to consider even at this late date, because once we cut beta - and certainly once we cut final - we'll be stuck supporting whatever interface we release for 5+ years. There is no similar risk for this patch - the only risk of not committing this feature now is that we won't have this feature in 9.1. But if we accept that as valid justification for committing it, then everything is fair game, and that is not going to lead to a timely release. > Why is this even a discussion point? Adding more new code is likely to add more new bugs, and we're trying not to do that right now, so we can make a release. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: