Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=nThZkbzaRqZk_zwXP2RLi+-t-271ihV=jYznW@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements
Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > On 14 September 2010 17:16, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: >>> I think a consensus needs to be reached on what you guys want >>> changing. Implementing changes isn't a problem, it's what changes >>> should be implemented. Whatever is decided, it needs to be easy to >>> visually scan the page and its sections, clean and consistent. >> >> It seems like you're giving up just when we've just about got >> consensus. Please don't. > > No, not at all. :) I'm just suggesting that rather than people > making a suggestion, and me going ahead and putting that change in > straight away (like I have been doing), it should have the support of > more than a single person first, otherwise there'll be lots of > tweaking and un-tweaking without any real agreement. > > If you wish to go ahead with what we've currently got, I'll create > another patch for Magnus to stage, otherwise what requires changing > needs to be decided. Oh, OK. Well, +1 for pushing live what's currently at: http://pgweb.darkixion.com:8081/docs/8.4/static/sql-syntax-lexical.html It's probably not perfect, but I think it's better than what we have now, and that's sufficient. Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: