Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=m4HDGFnarUyoSwtute81d9F=_fOFEO4R0k3H2@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 20:12, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mié dic 29 11:40:34 -0300 2010: >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 15:05, Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Any specific reason NOREPLICATION_P and REPLICATION_P use the _P suffix? >> >> Um, I just copied it off a similar entry elsewhere. I saw no comment >> about what _P actually means, and I can't say I know. I know very >> little about the bison files :-) > > Some lexer keywords have a _P prefix because otherwise they'd collide > with some symbol in Windows header files or something like that. It's > old stuff, but I think you, Magnus, were around at that time. Heh. That doesn't mean I *remember* it :-) But yes, I see in commit 12c942383296bd626131241c012c2ab81b081738 the comment "convert some keywords.c symbols to KEYWORD_P to prevent conflict". Based on that, I should probably change it back, right? I just tried a patch for it and it compiles and checks just fine with the _P parts removed. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: