Re: Database file copy
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Database file copy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=cj4ZJf884U7oSFhUu6zrBEgkbzNG_2aavmWbF@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Database file copy (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Database file copy
Re: Database file copy |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: >> If we're going to be supporting that long term, we should probably >> change the note about FREEZE being deprecated, though. > >> So, still +1 on removing the wording about FREEZE being deprecated, >> but instead we should mention what actually *is* deprecated (the >> omission of the parentheses). > > If we're going to do that, we should deprecate the unparenthesized > syntax altogether, with an eye to de-reserving VERBOSE and ANALYZE > as well. I'm not wildly enthusiastic about breaking this with only one intervening release. We normally support deprecated syntax for quite a bit longer than that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: