Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=cD__22DuhnqY9u9m52uyqtrdw__kYP11d0pUm@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 16:15, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 13:18, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Adding a #define to our headers that you can test for seems like the way to go. > >> That's kind of what I was going for ;) > > I don't see the point. You're going to need a *run time* test on > PQserverVersion to figure out what the server will return, no? I need *both*. > Also, if you really do need to figure out which PG headers you're > compiling against, looking at catversion.h is the accepted way to do it. > There's no need for yet another symbol. This file is, AFAIK, not included with client installs? It's definitely not present in the libpq-dev package on debian. It's a backend development file, no? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: