Bikeshedding on enum vocabulary
От | Aidan Van Dyk |
---|---|
Тема | Bikeshedding on enum vocabulary |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=aHU0uR=vrztJsbHUGYZY_RfEqvX+bU-29Ji3Y@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Bikeshedding on enum vocabulary
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Wow, this must be the most difficult smallest thing I have ever seen > discussed in pg-hackers. It doesn't seem like there are enough votes > in any particular direction. Now *this* is proper bikeshedding. > > Should we ask more openly in another thread, with a different, more > catchy subject? Well, as someone coming to enums from a C/C++ background, element is the last thing I would have thought. _My_ scale of intuitiveness is: 1) label (my normal vocabulary when talking about enums) 2) identifier [constant] (when talking spec-type jargon) Never have I thought of the enum label as either a "value", or an "element". That's not to say anyone else hasn't thought of them differently. Obvously ;-) </bikeshed> -- Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god, aidan@highrise.ca command like a king, http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: