On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 15:25 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>> No, I've never wished wait-forever option for now. I'd like to make
>> the primary work alone when there is no connected standby, for
>> high-availability.
>
> allow_standalone_primary seems to need to be better through than it is
> now, yet neither of us think its worth having.
>
> If the people that want it can think it through a little better then it
> might make this release, but I propose to remove it from this current
> patch to allow us to commit with greater certainty and fewer bugs.
+1 to remove the "wait-forever" behavior and the parameter for 9.1.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center