Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTi=_xiib0fhHdQ9RqhWvQUXii4-w=+H883iObMh8@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4 (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
|
| Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > > Can't we just have it set a variable we could check with a #ifdef? We > don't use PQconninfoParse in many files (actually, two). So it would be > pretty easy to add the #ifdef line, so that it won't be a big issue for > packagers. We use PQconninfoParse to check to ensure we have a new enough libpq to use application_name, so we can avoid sending it with older libpqs. If we disable the check for older libpqs, then we'll always get an error with them. The only way to fix that would be to only allow a 9.0 libpq to be used. The current code at least allows 8.4 and 9.0 libpqs. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: