Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
От | Itagaki Takahiro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTi=_U0LwoPxJxr+ncbv9K+54wjE8vMUM6VaYATN2@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> wrote: >>> This patch turns the existing autovacuum launcher into an always running >>> process, partly called the coordinator. > > It's not clear to me whether it's better to have a single coordinator > process that handles both autovacuum and other things, or whether it's > better to have two separate processes. Ah, we can separate the proposal to two topics: A. Support to run non-vacuum jobs from autovacuum launcher B. Support "userdefined background processes" A was proposed in the original "1 of 6" patch, but B might be more general. If we have a separated coordinator, B will be required. Markus, do you need B? Or A + standard backend processes are enough? If you need B eventually, starting with B might be better. -- Itagaki Takahiro
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: